Traditional banking vs. DeFi: Is the financial system being overhauled?

Traditional banking vs. DeFi: Is the financial system being overhauled?
By Riya Chaudhary

The financial world is abuzz with the rise of decentralised finance as a challenger to traditional banking. With promise of greater transparency and inclusivity, DeFi is stirring up a debate. 

The emergence of decentralised finance (DeFi) has sparked a discussion about the future of financial services. Traditional banking has long been the backbone of the financial system, but DeFi introduces a radically different approach that could reshape the landscape. 

 

 

 

Centralised vs. decentralised  

Central authorities and intermediaries, such as central banks and regulatory bodies, control transactions, interest rates, and service availability in traditional fiat banking systems. While this provides stability and trust, it also introduces bureaucracy and inflexibility. Historically, banks have had slow approval processes and outdated technology in physical branches. 

DeFi has no centralised control because it runs on blockchain, primarily Ethereum. Through self-executing smart contracts, transaction fees are reduced and processing times are shortened. Additionally, DeFi's open-source nature enables continuous evolution. 

 

Regulatory frameworks 

One of the significant distinctions between traditional banking and DeFi is regulatory oversight. Traditional banks are subject to strict regulations and compliance requirements designed to protect consumers and maintain financial stability. These regulations cover everything from anti-money laundering (AML) and know your customer (KYC) requirements to capital reserves and risk management practices. Banks are required to adhere to these regulations, which help prevent fraud and ensure the safety of deposits. 

DeFi platforms, on the other hand, operate in a more fluid regulatory environment. While some projects are starting to attract regulatory attention, the space remains largely unregulated compared to traditional banking. This lack of regulation can foster innovation and reduce barriers to entry, allowing for the rapid development of new financial products and services. However, it also raises concerns about security, fraud, and market manipulation. The absence of a regulatory safety net means that users must rely on the robustness of the technology and the credibility of the platform. 

 

Access and inclusivity 

Traditional banking systems often create barriers to entry through processes such as credit checks, minimum balance requirements, and geographic restrictions. This can exclude individuals without access to credit or those living in underbanked regions. For example, individuals in remote areas or with limited financial history may struggle to access traditional banking services.  

DeFi aims to address these limitations by providing open access to financial services. With just an internet connection, users can access DeFi platforms and participate in various economic activities, from lending and borrowing to trading and investing. This inclusivity aims to democratise finance and provide opportunities for individuals underserved by traditional banks. DeFi platforms often require only a digital wallet and an internet connection, removing many of the traditional barriers to entry. 

 As DeFi continues to grow, it is challenging traditional banking by offering something different—more freedom, lower costs, and easier access. While traditional banks have long been the cornerstone of stability and regulation, DeFi introduces new ideas that could potentially open financial services to everyone. The future may see a combination of both approaches, with the best elements of each coming together to create a system that works better for more people. The real challenge ahead will be finding the right balance between innovation and regulation to keep banking transactions safe for all. 

Keywords:

Decentralised Finance (DeFi),

Traditional banking,

Blockchain technology,

DeFi platforms,

Centralised banking system,

Regulatory frameworks,

Financial inclusion,

Transparency,

Barriers to entry,

Financial services,

Democratise finance,

Innovation in finance,

Centralised control,

Smart contracts,

Financial regulation,

DeFi vs traditional banks,

Open-source technology,

Access to financial services,

Banking stability,

Financial innovation.

Institution:

HSBC,

Aave,

MakerDAO,

Ethereum